The Religion of Politics

TlSTTY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA (Kommontoealtt) of HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, JAN.. 6, 1842. Ordered, That Messrs. DUGGAN, of Quincy, GREELE, of Boston, and READ, of Pawtucket, be a Committee to present the thanks of the House to the Rev. EZKA S. GANNETT, for the able and eloquent Discourse, delivered by him yesterday, before the Government of the Commonwealth, and to request a copy thereof for publication. L. S. GUSHING, Clerk SERMON 1 CORINTHIANS, x. 31. N WHETHER YE EAT OR DRINK, OR WHATSOEVER YE DO, DO ALL TO THE GLORY OF GOD. THE solemnities of this occasion belong to a Chris- tian people. By them religion is solicited to throw her protection and authority around the institutions of the State. The citizen and the magistrate recog- nife their common relation to a higher Power than the functionary or the State, and in such recognition exchange the pledge of a mutual fidelity. The cus- tom which this day renews comes to us from the founders of the Commonwealth — men of strong faith and religious hearts, who erected their political fabric as a temple in which to worship God, and inscribed over its front the name of the one Master whom they honored, even Christ. The place to which our legis- lators and rulers have come upon entering on their official duties is the house of prayer and Christian in- struction. Every thing that distinguishes the occa- sion seems to point out the course of remark in which he who addresses -this audience should invite his hear- ers to follow him. The relation of religion to poli- tics— the religion of political life — is the subject to which he is unequivocally directed ; and of which it is my purpose to treat, at such length only as the lim- its of the occasion will allow, but with such plainness of speech as should alone be used before freemen by one as free as they when speaking on their common duties. There is however what may be called a political side to this subject, on which it would be improper for me to introduce any remarks at this time. The bare mention of religion and politics in connexion alarms some minds, who fear lest the liberties of the people be invaded by zealous religionists, or the pub- lic affairs of the time be handled by honest or ambi- tious preachers — in either case wandering beyond their appropriate limits. Let me at the outset dis- claim all intention of touching questions to which a temporary interest only can belong, or of assailing the order of our civil state. It is higher ground which I hope to occupy as I examine the religious aspects of citizenship. When I speak of the religion of political life, I mean that religion should control men in the exercise of their political rights as it should control them in all their other relations and concerns. The religion of politics is nothing else than the application of religious principles to politi- cal action, whether it be the action of a statesman or a private citizen, of an individual or of the com- munity. The politician should respect these princi- ples as much as any other man. Political opinion, political discussion, political life should be brought under the influence of religious convictions. This is the ground which I take, and which I shall endeavor to prove is the only ground on which a Christian can consistently stand. Religion should govern all political sentiment and action. Why not? Why should such a claim on behalf of religion be accounted extravagant, or meet with any other than a unanimous assent ? Is not religion the supreme law ; so acknowledged by the people of this land, at least by the thoughtful and sober part of the people ? We but repeat one of the common-places of the pulpit, which however disre- garded no one thinks of denying, when we say that the influence of religion should be paramount in every department of life. We but adopt an illustra- tion with which every one is familiar, when we speak of it as a spiritual atmosphere, that must enclose the institutions and movements of society, and insinuate itself into every form of personal existence. The authority of religion, its right to exercise sway over human wills and human hearts, is admitted on all sides. It is not monks and nuns, nor religious teach- ers and their families, upon whom in these days it is believed that the command to fear God and work righteousness expends its force ; it is not men on sick beds and in dying moments alone, of whom it is said, that they ought to think of the duty which de- volves on them in view of their relations to God and eternity ; but men and women full of life, in the midst of life's cares, temptations and labours — the young, the vigorous, the busy — merchants in their traffic, farmers in the fields, scholars in their studies, mechanics in their workshops, the wife and mother in her domestic occupations, the daughter of toil at her needle — the rich, the poor — the wise, the sim- ple— all should be religious, heartily, truly, constantly religious. This is the doctrine of the present time ; or if it is not, it should be. This is the democratic doctrine about religion, and this is the Christian doc- trine about religion. It includes all men under one law, and all sinners under one condemnation. Now why shall the politician be released from the demand made upon every one else ? Why shall political life form an episode in the history traced by successive generations on the tablet of the ages, which shall have not only its own rules of composition, but its own principles of moral interpretation ? …